lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [RFC] klibc requirements
    On Wed Jan 09, 2002 at 03:15:14PM +0100, Felix von Leitner wrote:
    > Thus spake Greg KH (greg@kroah.com):
    > > > > - portable, runs on all platforms that the kernel currently
    > > > > works on, but doesn't have to run on any non-Linux based OS.
    > > You didn't address this. What are the future plans of porting dietLibc
    > > to the platforms that are not currently supported by it (but are by
    > > Linux)?
    >
    > We will attempt to port the diet libc to every Linux platform that we
    > have access to. I won't go out and buy hardware to port my software to,
    > so if anyone needs the diet libc ported somewhere, I need an account on
    > a test box somewhere.
    >
    > We are currently missing sh-linux, ia64-linux and m68k-linux and
    > probably a few architectures that I have never heard of ;)

    uClibc runs on both sh and ,68k, so the only arch missing
    coverage with either dietlibc or uClibc seems to be ia64.

    -Erik

    --
    Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/
    --This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:18    [W:0.024 / U:2.088 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site