lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]   [less markup]   [headers]   [forward]  
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateWed, 9 Jan 2002 07:57:23 -0700
FromErik Andersen <>
SubjectRe: [RFC] klibc requirements
On Wed Jan 09, 2002 at 02:23:46PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
> I can think of that in a fast thought:
> 
> - if fsck.* can be there, it will make fs nice, just now they have to
>   be able to fsck a ro root fs.

That would be a nice addition.

> - I suppose that you can put here also the raid autodetect code and
>   things like that.
> - you also need a very small minishell, something like nash (that
>   cames with mkinitrd will suffice).

busybox lash
    http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/cvsweb/busybox/shell/lash.c?rev=1.142&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup
or busybox msh or busybox ash if you need something thats
all posix compliant. 

> - as I suppose that you have supposed insmod is essential :)

busybox insmod

> - you already put there IP autoconfiguration.

udhcp

 -Erik

--
Erik B. Andersen             http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:15    [W:2.007 / U:1.390 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans