lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: __FUNCTION__
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 02:01:50PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
>
> Can you point me to the place in the spec this is defined? I don't see
> __FUNCTION__ defined anywhere in the ISO/IEC 9899:1999 (the official C99)
> specification.

Don't have a C99 spec, but here's what info gcc has to say about it:

[...description of "function names" extension as currently found in gcc...]

Note that these semantics are deprecated, and that GCC 3.2 will
handle `__FUNCTION__' and `__PRETTY_FUNCTION__' the same way as
`__func__'. `__func__' is defined by the ISO standard C99:

The identifier `__func__' is implicitly declared by the translator
as if, immediately following the opening brace of each function
definition, the declaration
static const char __func__[] = "function-name";

appeared, where function-name is the name of the lexically-enclosing
function. This name is the unadorned name of the function.


Jeroen

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.095 / U:0.212 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site