[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable
    On Tue, 2002-01-08 at 16:08, Rik van Riel wrote:

    > The preemptible kernel ALSO has to wait for a scheduling point
    > to roll around, since it cannot preempt with spinlocks held.
    > Considering this, I don't see much of an advantage to adding
    > kernel preemption.

    It only has to wait if locks are held and then only until the locks are
    dropped. Otherwise it will preempt on the next return from interrupt.

    Future work would be to look into long-held locks and see what we can

    Without preempt-kernel, we have none of this: either run until
    completion or explicit scheduling points.

    Robert Love

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.032 / U:10.168 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site