![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Tue, 2002-01-08 at 15:18, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > Instead, a decision needs to be made: "Linux will henceforth be a > > low-latency kernel". > > I thought the intention was to make it a config option? It was originally, it is now, and I intend it to be. Further, since it uses the existing SMP locks, it doesn't introduce new design decisions (the one being protection of implicitly locked per-CPU data on preempt). Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:15 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||