![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
>Linux version 2.4.0-test3 (root@a70) (gcc version 2.95.3 20010315 >(release)) #2 Sat Jan 5 22:01:56 CET 2002 I understand that you've tested upto and including 2.4.16 but that kernel oops information is a bit dated. Please reproduce with latest 2.4.18-pre and submit a decoded oops. >Not overclocked. I even tried to lower the speed to 375 MHz, running 75 >MHz bus speed. Although you're not overclocking your CPU, you're actually overclocking most of the busses on your system now... >The problems disappear if I disable the secondary cache, but I guess >that is because the stress on the system decreases and not because it's >faulty. Thats because you were running an overclocked FSB, your L2 runs at a multiple of your FSB. L2 caches are very delicate especially when overclocked. E.g. I have a CPU (C366) which can do 600Mhz stable with the L2 disabled and only 577 with it enabled. But losing your L2 cache slows things _considerably_. Try running memtest86 (I believe it tests caches as well), this definately sounds like hardware problems. Regards, Zwane Mwaikambo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 11:15 [W:1.287 / U:0.040 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | ||||||||||