![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
* Eric S. Raymond (esr@thyrsus.com) wrote: > CPU_ARM922_D_CACHE_ON > CPU_ARM922_I_CACHE_ON > CPU_ARM922_WRITETHROUGH Hmm - is there anything ARM922 specific about these - i.e. is there a reason that we shouldn't get rid of them and have some architecture independent symbols CPU_D_CACHE_ON, CPU_I_CACHE_ON and CPU_CACHE_WRITETHROUGH (and more to your taste) and then architectures can use the ones which apply to them. Doesn't seem to be a point in having dupes. Dave ---------------- Have a happy GNU millennium! ---------------------- / Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux on Alpha,68K| Happy \ \ gro.gilbert @ treblig.org | MIPS,x86,ARM, SPARC and HP-PA | In Hex / \ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:15 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||