![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Jan 07, 2002 18:46 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > I greatly prefer function pointers to [possibly] generic obj management > code, to storing object sizes. Some filesystem is inevitably going to > want to do something even more clever with inode allocation. My method > gives developers the freedom to experiement with inode alloc to their > heart's desires, without affecting any other filesystem. Oh, I totally agree. I think stacking filesystems will generally want to be able to do their own inode-private allocation. Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2resize/ http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:15 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||