![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 04:01:33PM +0000, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> >> > at this point we have what Linus described:
> >> >
> >> > struct ext2_inode_info {
> >> > ...ext2 stuff...
> >> > struct inode inode;
> >> > };
> >
> >Interesting, it's something I've always wanted to be able to do. But I
> >suppose the compiler requirement is a stupport.
>
> Yes. I wonder if gcc people can be persuaded to backport annonymous
> structures and unions into gcc-2.95...?
You can fake it in a semi-messy way, using a #define, like:
#define STRUCT_INODE \
struct list_head i_hash; \
struct list_head i_list; \
struct list_head i_dentry; \
...
struct inode {
STRUCT_INODE;
};
struct ext2_inode_info {
...ext2 stuff...
STRUCT_INODE;
};
--
Mark Zealey
mark@zealos.org
mark@itsolve.co.uk
UL++++>$ G!>(GCM/GCS/GS/GM) dpu? s:-@ a16! C++++>$ P++++>+++++$ L+++>+++++$
!E---? W+++>$ N- !o? !w--- O? !M? !V? !PS !PE--@ PGP+? r++ !t---?@ !X---?
!R- b+ !tv b+ DI+ D+? G+++ e>+++++ !h++* r!-- y--
(www.geekcode.com)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:15 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||