![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sun, 6 Jan 2002, David S. Miller wrote: > Some of the low end single zone machines (m68k, sparc32, arm etc) > could benefit from losing ->virtual too. > Sparc32 has kmapping, so it would need virtual. I'm curious to see how large the tradeoff is with calculating virtual in page_address(). The overhead there may be larger than the win we get from better cacheline footprint in struct page -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:15 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||