![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
> From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> > Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 16:32:05 +1100 (EST) > * I need a way to tell the compiler not to make any assumptions about > what objects that such a pointer might or might not point to, so > that the effect of dereferencing the pointer is simply to access the > memory at the address I gave, and is not considered "undefined" > regardless of how I might have constructed the address. > GCC already does the first and third, but there doesn't seem to be a > clean and reliable way to do the second. I gave such a snippet of code in my previous posting. Please show me when it doesn't work. I am unaware. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 11:15 [W:0.126 / U:0.450 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | ||||||||||