[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [CFT] Unbork fs.h + per-fs supers
    On January 5, 2002 10:54 am, Alexander Viro wrote:
    > On Sat, 5 Jan 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote:
    > > Adding VFS support for per-fs superblock size was dead simple compared to
    > > doing the inodes because superblocks are few enough that no slab cache is
    > > needed, and also because of cleanup Al had already done.
    > *Stop*.
    > First of all, exporting size of superblock is wrong, since the entire
    > ->read_super() mechanism is going to be replaced with ->get_super(type, ...)
    > (get_sb_...() becoming commonly used instances of the method). Moreover,
    > freeing superblock is very likely to become a method (for quite a few
    > reasons).
    > Please, don't turn fs type into a bloody mess. It's bad enough as it
    > is; at least don't add the stuff that will go away anyway.

    How would you suggest it be done?

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.024 / U:1.664 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site