![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Dieter [iso-8859-15] Nützel wrote: > What next? Maybe a combination of O(1) and preempt? yes, fast preemption of kernel-mode tasks and the scheduler code are almost orthogonal. So i agree that to get the best interactive performance we need both. Ingo ps. i'm working on fixing the crashes you saw. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 11:15 [W:0.375 / U:0.470 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | ||||||||||