![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Friday, 4. January 2002 12:42, Ingo Molnar wrote: > On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Dieter [iso-8859-15] Nützel wrote: > > What next? Maybe a combination of O(1) and preempt? > > yes, fast preemption of kernel-mode tasks and the scheduler code are > almost orthogonal. So i agree that to get the best interactive performance > we need both. [....] gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=k6 -DEXPORT_SYMTAB -c filemap.c In file included from filemap.c:26: /usr/src/linux/include/linux/compiler.h:13: warning: likely' redefined /usr/src/linux/include/linux/sched.h:445: warning: this is the location of the previous definition /usr/src/linux/include/linux/compiler.h:14: warning: unlikely' redefined /usr/src/linux/include/linux/sched.h:444: warning: this is the location of the previous definition But _NO_ fails. -A2 crash immediatly during first boot. Second run some crashes and stuck in boot up. I'll try a clean 2.4.17 + A2 (plus needed ReiserFS stuff), now. -Dieter [unhandled content-type:application/x-bzip2][unhandled content-type:application/x-bzip2][unhandled content-type:application/x-bzip2] | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:15 [W:0.506 / U:0.090 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||