![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>:
> And of course, there will be a huge amount of false positives, because
> all the new chipsets have an ISA bridge built into the southbridge chip
> and it is there even when no ISA slots are present.
Yeah. That's what makes the lspci approach unusable for my purposes.
The approach I want to take is this:
1. Get guaranteed access to the DMI data, either via a /{proc,sys}/dmi
or /var/run/dmi initialized at boot time.
2. Develop an exception list of mobos that have ISA slots that don't
show up under DMI.
My logic would then be: if the box has PCI, and DMI shows no ISA slots,
and the motherboard is not on the exception list, then suppress ISA
questions.
This would be a kluge, but it would have the advantage that the exception
list is finite and can be expected to stop growing.
--
<a href="http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
The end move in politics is always to pick up a gun.
-- R. Buckminster Fuller
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:15 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||