lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]   [less markup]   [headers]   [forward]  
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin
DateThu, 31 Jan 2002 11:53:48 +0000 (GMT)
FromAlan Cox <>
> No you are wrong. This array is supposed to provide a readahead setting 
> on the driver level, which is bogous, since
> it's something that *should* not be exposed to the upper layers at all. 

Right.

>  we have already max_readahead in struut block_device as well. Please 
> note that this array only has

Ok. Now I look at it again yes - the array is completely surplus to current
requirements. 2.5 nicely sorts out the queues 


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 11:16    [W:0.499 / U:0.040 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans