![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
> No you are wrong. This array is supposed to provide a readahead setting > on the driver level, which is bogous, since > it's something that *should* not be exposed to the upper layers at all. Right. > we have already max_readahead in struut block_device as well. Please > note that this array only has Ok. Now I look at it again yes - the array is completely surplus to current requirements. 2.5 nicely sorts out the queues - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 11:16 [W:0.499 / U:0.040 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | ||||||||||