lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Machines misreporting Bogomips
The machine reporting cache size of 0KB is the one that's behaving
normally. The misbehaving machine is the one reporting 512K cache.

> > > cache size : 512 KB
...
> > > bogomips : 4.06

On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Roger Larsson wrote:

> On Fridayen den 1 February 2002 00.21, Matthew Dharm wrote:
> > I don't know if this will help much, but I have seen that type of
> > performance drop on systems when the entire cache is disabled.
> >
> > Matt
>
> >From the report below...
> > > cache size : 0 KB
>
> /RogerL
>
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 05:55:57PM -0500, Greg Boyce wrote:
> > > kernel folk,
> > >
> > > I've got a strange issue that I've been struggling to find the solution
> > > to for some time now.
> > >
> > > I work in a group that assists in the managing of large numbers of
> > > deployed linux boxes running variants of the 2.2 kernel on them. The
> > > machines themselves are all pretty standard. There are slight variances
> > > on vendors, cpu speeds, etc., but they're all running from the same
> > > motherboards.
> > >
> > > Every once in a while we come across single machines which are running a
> > > lot slower than they should be, and are misreporting their speed in
> > > bogomips under /proc/cpuinfo. Reinstalling the OS and changing versions
> > > of the kernel don't appear to affect the machines themselves at all.
> > >
> > > I was wondering if anyone would be able to provide me with a starting
> > > point to hunt this down. The only solution we had found in the past was
> > > to replace the machines, but some of them are located out of the country
> > > and that would be expensive.
> > >
> > > Here is the output from /proc/cpuinfo for machines. The first machine is
> > > normal, the second is affected by this bug. They're both running the
> > > same hardware, although the first machine's CPU is 650mhz instead of
> > > 500mhz.
> > >
> > > Machine 1:
> > > processor : 0
> > > vendor_id : GenuineIntel
> > > cpu family : 6
> > > model : 8
> > > model name : Pentium III (Coppermine)
> > > stepping : 3
> > > cpu MHz : 645.676332
> > > cache size : 0 KB
> > > fdiv_bug : no
> > > hlt_bug : no
> > > sep_bug : no
> > > f00f_bug : no
> > > coma_bug : no
> > > fpu : yes
> > > fpu_exception : yes
> > > cpuid level : 3
> > > wp : yes
> > > flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca
> > > cmov pat pse36 psn mmx osfxsr kni
> > > bogomips : 643.89
> > >
> > > Machine 2:
> > > processor : 0
> > > vendor_id : GenuineIntel
> > > cpu family : 6
> > > model : 7
> > > model name : Pentium III (Katmai)
> > > stepping : 3
> > > cpu MHz : 496.677416
> > > cache size : 512 KB
> > > fdiv_bug : no
> > > hlt_bug : no
> > > sep_bug : no
> > > f00f_bug : no
> > > coma_bug : no
> > > fpu : yes
> > > fpu_exception : yes
> > > cpuid level : 2
> > > wp : yes
> > > flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca
> > > cmov pat pse36 mmx osfxsr kni
> > > bogomips : 4.06
> > >
> > > Let me know if there's anything else I can provide to help with the
> > > diagnosis. The machine itself is an IBM Netfinity 4000R.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Gregory Boyce
> > >
> > >
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
> > > in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
> --
> Roger Larsson
> Skellefteå
> Sweden
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:16    [W:0.242 / U:0.160 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site