![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On 30 January 2002 00:46, Dave Jones wrote: > On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 09:51:00PM +0200, Kai Henningsen wrote: > > > - cleanliness > > > - concept > > > - timing > > > - testing > > > > IIRC, the number 33 referred to esr's Configure.help patch. Which of > > these did he violate? > > Timing. Linus was busy focusing on the block layer. Sounds alarming. Linus didn't take documentation updates from designated maintainer? For many months? I can't believe in argument that updates were able to break _anything_, it's only documentation, right? I could understand this if these updates were sent by little known person, but Eric?! Clearly a scalability problem here :-) I won't post to this thread more. Why? It's a flamewar, more _words_ will do nothing. _Action_ is needed. -- vda - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 11:15 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||