[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin
    On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Larry McVoy wrote:
    > On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 08:42:33AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
    > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 11:48:05PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > > It does in some ways anyhow. Following things downstream is rather
    > > painless, but one of the things we in the PPC tree hit alot is when we
    > > have a new file in one of the sub trees and want to move it up to the
    > > 'stable' tree
    > Summary: only an issue because Linus isn't using BK.

    Bitkeeper also seems to have some problems applying out-of-order
    changesets or applying them partially.

    Changesets sent by 'bk send' are also much harder to read than
    unidiffs ;)

    I think for bitkeeper to be useful for the kernel we really need:

    1) 'bk send' format Linus can read easily

    2) the ability to send individual changes (for example, the
    foo_net.c fixes from 1.324 and 1.350) in one nice unidiff

    3) the ability for Linus to apply patches that are slightly
    "out of order" - a direct consequence of (2)


    "Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS"
    -- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.021 / U:8.324 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site