lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [CFT] [JANITORIAL] Unbork fs.h


    On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

    > In article <E16M7Gz-00015E-00@starship.berlin> you wrote:
    > > - inode = get_empty_inode();
    > > + inode = get_empty_inode(sb);
    >
    > How about killing get_empty_inode completly and using new_inode() instead?
    > There should be no regularly allocated inode without a superblock.

    Seconded. However, you'll need to zero out ->i_dev for objects that
    traditionally have zero ->st_dev (pipes and sockets).

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.019 / U:119.756 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site