lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [CFT] [JANITORIAL] Unbork fs.h


On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> In article <E16M7Gz-00015E-00@starship.berlin> you wrote:
> > - inode = get_empty_inode();
> > + inode = get_empty_inode(sb);
>
> How about killing get_empty_inode completly and using new_inode() instead?
> There should be no regularly allocated inode without a superblock.

Seconded. However, you'll need to zero out ->i_dev for objects that
traditionally have zero ->st_dev (pipes and sockets).

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.206 / U:0.816 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site