[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [CFT] [JANITORIAL] Unbork fs.h

On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> In article <> you wrote:
> > - inode = get_empty_inode();
> > + inode = get_empty_inode(sb);
> How about killing get_empty_inode completly and using new_inode() instead?
> There should be no regularly allocated inode without a superblock.

Seconded. However, you'll need to zero out ->i_dev for objects that
traditionally have zero ->st_dev (pipes and sockets).

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.100 / U:1.284 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site