![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
> > Why do you think they _have to_ have "none"? Is it POSIXized or > > otherwise standardized? Where can I RTFM? > > I do not think they have to. They just are :-) > > fs/namespace.c:show_vfsmnt() > > ... > mangle(m, mnt->mnt_devname ? mnt->mnt_devname : "none"); > > > I find this convention quite useful. It allows any program to easily > skip virtual filesystems. Using something like /dev or devfs in this > case does not add any bit of useful information but possibly adds to > confusion. Maybe you're right. It's up to maintainer to decide. Richard, do you need updated patch without "none" -> "devfs"? -- vda - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:18 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||