Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 30 Jan 2002 03:21:38 +0100 | From | Dave Jones <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] 2.5: push BKL out of llseek |
| |
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 09:20:10PM -0500, Robert Love wrote:
> I feared this too, but eventually I decided it was worth it and > benchmarks backed that up. If nothing else this is yet-another-excuse > for locks that can spin-then-sleep. > I posted dbench results, which show a positive gain even on 2-way for > multiple client loads.
did you benchmark with anything other than dbench ?
-- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |