![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
> With the patch, the hardware seems to work OK. I don't know whether the > "fix" causes a "break" on any other nm256 hardware. I have tested the > patch on kernels 2.2.19 and 2.2.20 -- once I upgrade to Debian testing > I'll try out a 2.4 kernel. I'm posting this now in the hope that this > information might be of use to at least one other nm256 user out there. > It's a darn sight better than the pcsp patch! I've thrown it into my working test set for the next -ac - we'll see if it breaks any other chips pretty soon. The diff applies as is to 2.4. Thanks Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:15 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||