![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
In article <E16UyCO-0002zE-00@the-village.bc.nu> you wrote: >> CPU0 states: 27.2% user, 62.4% system, 0.0% nice, 9.2% idle >> CPU1 states: 28.4% user, 62.3% system, 0.0% nice, 8.1% idle > The important bit here is ^^^^^^^^ that one. Something is causing > horrendous lock contention it appears. Is the e100 driver optimised for SMP > yet ? there's WAY too many busy waits (upto 500 msec with irq's disabled) in e100 to call it smp optimized.... also in most tests I've seen eepro100 won outright - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:15 [W:1.655 / U:0.460 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||