![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Saturday 26 January 2002 11:11, Andrea Ferraris scrisse: > Friday 25 January 2002 23:59, Jeff Garzik scrisse: > > Well, the code says "this should never happen" ;-) > > > > But anyway, it is probably a temporary memory allocation failure. The > > code handles this case. > > Yes, but I think that isn't normal to have to do a cold reboot to have the > machine again working on the network. It is, maybe that the code doesn't > handle so well this case. Do you suggest a kernel upgrade? Ops ... sorry. It was a 2.2.16 kernel. Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:15 [W:0.428 / U:0.100 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||