lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]   [less markup]   [headers]   [forward]  
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateFri, 25 Jan 2002 13:26:53 +0100
FromDave Jones <>
SubjectRe: 2.4.18pre4aa1
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 01:35:08AM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:

 > Considering the possible bad consequences for real
 > workloads, I'm not sure I want to make the system more
 > unfair just to better accomodate dbench ;)

 it may be useful if Randy can throw a real world test
 into the benchmarking, to get a better comparison of
 the various systems. The obvious one that springs to mind
 would be something like compilation of a large source tree
 kernel/mozilla/etc..  (same version, same config options
 every time). Though, as compilation is largely compute bound,
 instead of IO bound, the more small files that need to be
 read/generated the better.

 Or maybe timing an updatedb. Its realworld enough in that its
 a daily task, generates lots of IO..

-- 
| Dave Jones.        http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 11:15    [from the cache]
©2003-2008