[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: RFC: booleans and the kernel
Timothy Covell wrote:
> On Thursday 24 January 2002 14:39, Oliver Xymoron wrote:
> >
> > The compiler _will_ turn if(a==0) into a test of a with itself rather than
> > a comparison against a constant. Since PDP days, no doubt.
> I thought that the whole point of booleans was to stop silly errors
> like
> if ( x = 1 )
> {
> printf ("\nX is true\n");
> }
> else
> {
> # we never get here...
> }

Booleans won't help that. If you _want_ to fix that, change
the assignment operator so it don't look like a comparison.
Perhaps x <- 45; or something. Won't happen to C of course.

Oh, and writing if (a=b) is valid way of testing for a non-zero
b while also assigning to a. I write code that way when I
need such a set of operation. Short, elegant, and no, it isn't
hard to read at all.

Helge Hafting
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:18    [W:0.162 / U:5.252 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site