lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateFri, 25 Jan 2002 15:03:16 -0200 (BRST)
FromRik van Riel <>
SubjectRe: 2.4.18pre4aa1
On Fri, 25 Jan 2002, David Weinehall wrote:

> One thing that struck me about this; doesn't both the rmap-patches and
> the aa-patches contain other changes than merely changes to the VM? If
> so, couldn't these changes tip the result in an unfair direction?! After
> all, what we want is a VM-to-VM shoot-out, not a VM-to-VM+whatever
> shoot-out. After all, one would assume that the non VM-related changes
> would be merged to the kernel no matter what VM is used, right?

The -aa kernel seems to contain patches to a few dozen subsystems.

The -rmap patch is pretty much only VM changes.

You're right that this is not a strict VM vs VM comparison...

kind regards,

Rik
-- 
"Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS"
    -- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document

http://www.surriel.com/		http://distro.conectiva.com/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:15    [from the cache]
©2003-2008