![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On 24 Jan 2002, Ed Sweetman wrote: > You should check your /var/log/messages directly for this nifty little > message. > kernel: ACPI: APM is already active, exiting > > If you compiled in apm at the time you did that test, acpi wasn't even > active and thus the special athlon disconnect patch wasn't even > working. So all of that better cooling would be psychoschomatic. > Wouldn't be the first time better cooling/performance was all in the > head of the person using the hardware...although if you didn't have apm > compiled in then none of this matters and it was all working. But i > doubt that is true due to the 42C idle after some use no matter which > kernel was being used. for the test i build a new kernel without any acpi function but with apm ompiled in ... if you mean this ... the results where those i posted ... > Furthermore, I haven't heard of anyone where the patch actually makes an > improvement in temp with the patch. But i have heard of people saying > it affected performance detrimentally. If it is helping and the cpu fans > decrease due to the lower temp, add fan speeds in different loads/temps > to reflect this. > lowering the fan speed and thus noise is more than a welcome change. my cpu is cooled down and my cpu fan + 2 temperature controlled case fans are slowed down -> lesser noise ... daniel # Daniel Nofftz # Sysadmin CIP-Pool Informatik # University of Trier(Germany), Room V 103 # Mail: daniel@nofftz.de - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:18 [W:0.173 / U:0.060 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||