lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateThu, 24 Jan 2002 17:23:08 -0800
FromAndrew Morton <>
SubjectRe: Testing the effects of the low latency patch
J Sloan wrote:
> 
> >>2.4.18-pre6+tux+nfs-fixes
> >>-------------
> >>...
> >>7.6 1
> >>7.8 1
> >>21.1 1
> >>
> >
> >This is the stock kernel.  In twenty minutes you suffered
> >precisely *one* scheduling overrun which is perceptible
> >by a human.  The rest are much shorter than your monitor's
> >refresh interval.  Interesting, yes?
> >
> Yes, the stock kernel is much improved from
> say 6 months ago. I will take a look at the
> kernel that shipped with my distro just for
> giggles as well...
> 

Was you histogram generated during a game session, or during
dbench?  write()-intensive workloads are the main common
offender.

-
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:15    [from the cache]
©2003-2008