![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
phillips@bonn-fries.net (Daniel Phillips) wrote on 22.01.02 in <E16Snav-0001kl-00@starship.berlin>: > On January 21, 2002 06:05 pm, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote: > > Daniel Phillips wrote: > > > > > > > > I detect a slight lack of symmetry here, shouldn't it be "make > > > autoconfig"? Pardon me if this has been beaten to^W^W discussed above. > > > > > > Yes. It should be "make autoconfig", for symmterty reasons :-) > > I called the files and the project autoconfigure, because > > 'autoconfig' is already an utility made by GNU. (not related > > to kernel) > > This is kernel autoconfig, different namespace, same idea. I don't think > you have a problem. Besides, last time I checked, autoconfig wasn't > copyrighted. Last time I checked, autoconf (not -ig) was GPL. But as long as you don't use code from it, copyright is completely irrelevant anyway: trademark status might be relevant when you're talking about names. (And %@$&$! patent status when talking about algorithms.) MfG Kai - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:15 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||