lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 05:05:01PM +0100, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > I think of "benefit", perhaps naiively, in terms of something that can
> > be measured or demonstrated rather than just announced.
>
> But you see why asap scheduling improves latency/throughput *in theory*,

Nope. And I don't even see a relationship between preemption and asap I/O
schedulding. What make you think that I/O threads won't be preempted by
other threads?

> don't you? As for the measured benefit, there have been a steady stream of
> postive reports on lkml.

I have not seen a single well structured benchmark that shows a significant
difference. I've seen lots of benchmarks with odd mixes of different patches
showing something unknown. How about a simple clear dbench?

>My own experience is that the usability of my
> laptop with its small memory is much improved under heavy IO load.

No comment.

--
---------------------------------------------------------
Victor Yodaiken
Finite State Machine Labs: The RTLinux Company.
www.fsmlabs.com www.rtlinux.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:1.978 / U:0.584 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site