![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
"Mr. James W. Laferriere" wrote: > > This is just what the Heads are trying to do away with . There > will only be module enabled kernels . JimL I suspect none of these "Heads" spend much time in protracted email debug sessions. Because the *first* thing you do is ask the tester to compile the relevant driver into the kernel. The problems which the removal of this option will cause include: 1: Inability to look up symbols in the kernel elf image. 2: Breaks the kernel profiler 3: breaks kgdb 4: breaks ksymoops. How often have we seen nonsensical backtraces here because modules were involved? Possibly we can include a table of module base addresses in the Oops output and teach ksymoops about it. This proposal is, frankly, brain-damaged. It will significantly impeded kernel developers in remote problem diagnosis and it will weaken the kernel development toolchain. There's a lot of work to be done to overcome this damage, and given the difficulty of getting debug tools into the mainstream kernel, the damage may well be permanent. - - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:15 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||