[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Possible Idea with filesystem buffering.
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Hans Reiser wrote:
> Rik van Riel wrote:
> >On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, Hans Reiser wrote:

> >Agreed on these points, but you really HAVE TO work towards
> >flushing the page ->writepage() gets called for.
> >
> >Think about your typical PC, with memory in ZONE_DMA,
> >ZONE_NORMAL and ZONE_HIGHMEM. If we are short on DMA pages
> >we will end up calling ->writepage() on a DMA page.
> >
> >If the filesystem ends up writing completely unrelated pages
> >and marking the DMA page in question referenced the VM will
> >go in a loop until the filesystem finally gets around to
> >making a page in the (small) DMA zone freeable ...
> This is a bug in VM design, yes? It should signal that it needs the
> particular page written, which probnably means that it should use
> writepage only when it needs that particular page written,

That is exactly what the VM does.

> and should otherwise check to see if the filesystem supports something
> like pressure_fs_cache(), yes?

That's incompatible with the concept of memory zones.


"Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS"
-- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.059 / U:0.700 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site