![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wednesday January 2, phillips@bonn-fries.net wrote: > > Yes, that's all +5 insightful, except... what makes you think any one of the > Linux core hackers is irreplaceable? I know you didn't say that, but you > did say 'single point of failure', and it amounts to the same thing. > I think that the difference is that there is no planning to make sure that no-one is irreplaceable. Sure people can be replaced, but it might take a while. A subsystem might be unmaintained (or under-maintained) for a while until some sucker^Wdeveloper puts their hand up. That isn't a situation that a "fortune 500 bureaucracy" would be able to tolerate. But we seem to cope. NeilBrown - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 11:15 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||