![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 04:34:52PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 01:28:42AM +0200, Momchil Velikov wrote: > > > > GCC thinks exactly what the function does. > > And then optimizes it to something that fails to work in this particular > case. Which it may do with another function *or expression* as well, because the real bug has already happened before the function call comes into the issue. As far as I'm concerned the options are: fix RELOC; obviate RELOC; use an appropriate gcc option if available (-fPIC might be it, -ffreestanding certainly isn't--see above); *extend* (not fix, extend) gcc; or work around all individual cases. In rough descending order of preference. Jeroen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:15 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||