Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] scheduler fixups ... | From | Peter Osterlund <> | Date | 02 Jan 2002 23:31:04 +0100 |
| |
Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> writes:
> a still lower ts
This also lowers the effectiveness of nice values. In 2.5.2-pre6, if I run two cpu hogs at nice values 0 and 19 respectively, the niced task will get approximately 20% cpu time (on x86 with HZ=100) and this patch will give even more cpu time to the niced task. Isn't 20% too much?
-- Peter Osterlund - petero2@telia.com http://w1.894.telia.com/~u89404340 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |