[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Andre's IDE Patch (1/7)
I think I know what Andre is referring to (Andre please correct me if I am 
wrong) and if I am correct than you are still safe to use the currently
existing big patch (as long as you do NOT tamper with it in any way - I
mean that, a one line change is sufficient to destroy your data). If you
split it up, there is a _very_ high chance broken code will be executed
which will destroy your data on first time a PIO transfer occurs...

Best regards,


At 00:58 20/01/02, Rob Radez wrote:
>On Sat, 19 Jan 2002, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> > Please don't do that. There is a fatal flaw in those patches we all
> > observed in 2.5.3pre1. I have 2.4.16 as a possible candidate and
> > auto-patching for 2.4.17 at the moment.
>On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> > If the driver falls out of DMA, DEADBOX!!!!
> > There is a conflict of BIO and ACB and it is very fatal.
>It was my impression that the problem with 2.5.3-pre1 was a complication
>that existed only because of bio in 2.5. Oops. I assume this means then
>that all of us running your ide. should immediately
>revert so Bad Things don't happen?

"I've not lost my mind. It's backed up on tape somewhere." - Unknown
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at> (replace at with @)
Linux NTFS Maintainer / WWW:
ICQ: 8561279 / WWW:

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.065 / U:14.396 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site