[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Andre's IDE Patch (1/7)
    I think I know what Andre is referring to (Andre please correct me if I am 
    wrong) and if I am correct than you are still safe to use the currently
    existing big patch (as long as you do NOT tamper with it in any way - I
    mean that, a one line change is sufficient to destroy your data). If you
    split it up, there is a _very_ high chance broken code will be executed
    which will destroy your data on first time a PIO transfer occurs...

    Best regards,


    At 00:58 20/01/02, Rob Radez wrote:
    >On Sat, 19 Jan 2002, Andre Hedrick wrote:
    > > Please don't do that. There is a fatal flaw in those patches we all
    > > observed in 2.5.3pre1. I have 2.4.16 as a possible candidate and
    > > auto-patching for 2.4.17 at the moment.
    >On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Andre Hedrick wrote:
    > > If the driver falls out of DMA, DEADBOX!!!!
    > > There is a conflict of BIO and ACB and it is very fatal.
    >It was my impression that the problem with 2.5.3-pre1 was a complication
    >that existed only because of bio in 2.5. Oops. I assume this means then
    >that all of us running your ide. should immediately
    >revert so Bad Things don't happen?

    "I've not lost my mind. It's backed up on tape somewhere." - Unknown
    Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at> (replace at with @)
    Linux NTFS Maintainer / WWW:
    ICQ: 8561279 / WWW:

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.033 / U:3.200 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site