[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: clarification about redhat and vm
    Alan Cox wrote:
    > > "If redhat doesn't use the -aa VM " was a short form of "if redhat
    > > cannot see the goodness of all the bugfixing work that happened between
    > > the 2.4.9 VM and any current branch 2.4, and so if they keep shipping
    > > 2.4.9 VM as the best one for DBMS and critical VM apps like the SAP
    > > benchmark".
    > The RH VM is totally unrelated to the crap in 2.4.9 vanilla. The SAP comment
    > begs a question. 2.4.10 seems to have problems remembering to actually
    > do fsync()'s. How much of your SAP benchmark is from fsync's that dont
    > happen ? Do you get the same values with 2.4.18-aa ?

    Well, basically we checked the thing many times with quite different
    Our current tests - which show exactly the same results as
    2.4.[10,14,15] - run
    on the new "official" SuSE kernel 2.4.16. Again, we observe a
    performance increase
    in high swap situations of about a factor of ten compared to 2.4.[7,9].

    IMO, this shows that errors like fsync etc. are _not_ responsible for
    the improved

    But of course, we will check the newer kernels as well. I think we
    could live
    with another factor of ten ...

    Best regards

    Willi Nuesser
    SAP Linuxlab
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.035 / U:89.332 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site