lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateWed, 16 Jan 2002 04:12:16 -0500
FromJeff Garzik <>
SubjectRe: likely/unlikely
Anton Blanchard wrote:
> 
> 
> > likely/unlikely set the branch prediction values to 99% or 1%
> > respectively.  If this causes the code generated to perform less
> > optimally than without, I'm sure the gcc guys would be -very- interested
> > to hear that...
> 
> On some ppc64 the branch prediction is quite good and static prediction
> will override the dynamic prediction. I think we avoid predicting a
> branch unless we are quite sure (95%/5%).
> 
> So if likely/unlikely is overused (on more marginal conditionals) then
> it could be a performance loss.

oh agreed... but marginal conditionals should not be getting
likely()/unlikely() as you are then lying to the compiler about the true
branch predictability...

	Jeff


-- 
Jeff Garzik      | Alternate titles for LOTR:
Building 1024    | Fast Times at Uruk-Hai
MandrakeSoft     | The Took, the Elf, His Daughter and Her Lover
                 | Samwise Gamgee: International Hobbit of Mystery
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:23    [W:0.336 / U:0.010 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans