![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Ben Clifford <benc@hawaga.org.uk> writes: > The port 53 bindings happen without problem. > > BINDv9 has a lightweight resolver service which runs on port 921 - this is > not enabled by default, and when it is enabled, seems to start up later on > in the startup process. Ok, I'm running BINDv8 right now. > > You may use accessfs and capabilities in parallel, of course. But > > currently, this is equivalent to "chown root/chmod u+x". > > Taking capabilities away seems to break backwards compatibility. I'll think about this. I haven't heard about a working system or tools, which use capabilities yet. So I thought, nobody would see a difference. > And I'm not entirely sure it *is* equivalent to chown root/chmod u+x - > that is how /mnt/accessfs/net/ipv4/bind appeared and my named couldn't > bind to 921. I will investigate this further. Seems, I need to install BINDv9 to reproduce this problem. Regards, Olaf. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:23 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||