![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
"Richard B. Johnson" <root@chaos.analogic.com> said: [...] > Really??? Have you ever tried this? RedHat provides a directory > of random patches that won't patch regardless of the order in > which you attempt patches (based upon date-stamps on patches or > date-stamps on files). It's like somebody just copied in some > junk, thinking nobody would ever bother. rpm(1), particularly "rpm -p" on the SRPM. Or use the kernel-source RPM. Last time I looked, they carried around patches that weren't applied in the SRPM. > Some distributions don't even provide source. They provide > copies of /usr/src/linux/include/asm and /usr/src/linux/include/linux > but nothing else. You have to "find" source on the internet. They are in violation of GPL then. Make it clear to them. > The "good-ol-days" where you could get 72 floppies from Yggdrasil, > install Linux, and spend the next 48 hours watching it compile > are long gone. What stops you from getting Red Hat, and doing a massive "rpm --rebuild" today? > I have never found a distribution that uses modules, in which is > was even remotely possible to duplicate the kernel supplied. Why do they then bother to distribute sources? -- Horst von Brand http://counter.li.org # 22616 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 11:18 [W:0.652 / U:0.520 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | ||||||||||