Messages in this thread | | | From | Ed Tomlinson <> | Subject | Re: [patch] O(1) scheduler-H6/H7 and nice +19 | Date | Mon, 14 Jan 2002 20:37:30 -0500 |
| |
On January 13, 2002 10:45 pm, Davide Libenzi wrote: > On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, Ed Tomlinson wrote: > > With pre3+H7, kernel compiles still take 40% longer with a setiathome > > process running at nice +19. This is _not_ the case with the old > > scheduler. > > Did you try to set MIN_TIMESLICE to 10 ( sched.h ) ?make bzImage with setiathome running nice +19
This makes things a worst - note the decreased cpu utilizaton...
make bzImage 424.33s user 32.21s system 48% cpu 15:48.69 total
What is this telling us?
Ed Tomlinson
>>make bzImage 391.11s user 30.85s system 62% cpu 11:17.37 total >> >>make bzImage alone >> >>make bzImage 397.33s user 32.14s system 92% cpu 7:43.58 total >> >>Notice the large difference in run times...
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |