lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: cross-cpu balancing with the new scheduler

> eatcpu is a simple cpu hog ("for(;;);"). Dual CPU i386.
>
> $nice -19 ./eatcpu&;
> <wait>
> $nice -19 ./eatcpu&;
> <wait>
> $./eatcpu&.
>
> IMHO it should be
> * both niced process run on one cpu.
> * the non-niced process runs with a 100% timeslice.
>
> But it's the other way around:
> One niced process runs with 100%. The non-niced process with 50%, and
> the second niced process with 50%.

Rusty and I were talking about this recently. Would it make sense for
the load balancer to use a weighted queue length (sum up all priorities
in the queue?) instead of just balancing the queue length?

Anton
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.191 / U:0.316 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site