![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 01:54:12PM -0500, Eric S. Raymond wrote: > Charles Cazabon <charlesc@discworld.dyndns.org>: > > Yes, and yes. Aunt Tillie is running Linux because someone installed a > > distribution for her. > > You don't know that. Maybe she installed it herself. So she installed it herself, why isn't $distrovender kernel good enough? Keep in mind that just because $kernelversion has a bug doesn't mean that $distrovender-$kernelversion does. So yes, relying on an update from $distrovendor is a good thing. What if your automagic tool existed and Aunt Tillie clicked when 2.4.15 was current stable? > > She is never going to need anything out of her kernel that her vendor-shipped > > update kernels do not provide. > > *You can't know that.* Would you accept She'll almost never need something thats not in her current $distrovednor kernel or the one $distrovendor is working on? -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:15 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||