Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 13 Jan 2002 17:32:22 -0800 | From | William Lee Irwin III <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] update: preemptive kernel for O(1) sched |
| |
On Sun, 2002-01-13 at 18:22, Dieter N?tzel wrote: >> what about lock-break? >> I am running your former one as always with >> lock-break-rml-2.4.18-pre1-1.patch ...;-)
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 06:48:17PM -0500, Robert Love wrote: > I haven't tested O(1) together with lock-break personally, yet, but I > have a confirmation of success from a couple of users. There are no > reasons it shouldn't work.
I have at least run it on my laptop, together with rmap even. No pathological behavior that I can tell. Of course, the interactive response is wonderful, but I haven't precisely measured anything, as I have enough other things to measure precisely it's a bit far afield.
Cheers, Bill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |