![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On January 13, 2002 02:41 am, Alan Cox wrote: > [somebody wrote] > > For a solution to latency concerns, I'd much prefer to lay a framework > > down that provides a proper solution and then work on fine tuning the > > kernel to get the desired latency out of it. > > As the low latency patch proves, the framework has always been there, the > ll patches do the rest For that matter, the -preempt patch proves that the framework has always - i.e., since genesis of SMP - been there for a preemptible kernel. -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:15 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||