![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
> in the "Writeout in recent kernels..." thread) on this release. Performance and > observed writeout behavior was essentially the same as for 2.4.17, both stock > and with -rmap11a. Transfer time was 6:56 and writeout was uneven. 2.4.13-ac7 is > still the winner by a significant margin. That is very useful information actually. That does rather imply that some of the performance hit came from the block I/O elevator differences in the old ac tree (the ones Linus hated ;)). Now the question (and part of the reason Linus didnt like them) - is why ? Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:15 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||