![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sat, 2002-01-12 at 15:07, Alan Cox wrote: > > We don't preempt while IRQ are disabled. > > I must have missed that in the code. I can see you check __cli() status but > I didn't see anywhere you check disable_irq(). Even if you did it doesnt > help when I mask the irq on the chip rather than using disable_irq() calls. Well, if IRQs are disabled we won't have the timer... would not the system panic anyhow if schedule() was called while in an interrupt handler? Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:15 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||