[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Writeout in recent kernels/VMs poor compared to last -ac
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrea Arcangeli" <>
To: "Adam Kropelin" <>
Cc: <>
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 11:30 AM
Subject: Re: Writeout in recent kernels/VMs poor compared to last -ac

> On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 10:17:39AM -0500, Adam Kropelin wrote:
> > I recently began regularly transferring large (600 MB+) files to my
> > Linux-based fileserver and have noticed what I would characterize as poor
> > writeout behavior under this load. I've done a bit of comparison testing
> > which may help reveal the problem better.


> I think you simply want to trigger the soft-bdflush event earlier, with
> -aa something like this may do the trick:
> echo 5 500 64 256 500 3000 60 2 0 > /proc/sys/vm/bdflush
> this way you'll wakeup as soon as 5% of the 118mbytes (+ free memory,
> none in this case) are dirty, and bdflush will stop as soon as the level
> is back to 2% (then kupdate will take care of the 2%). Those suggested
> values may be too strict but this way you should get the idea if it
> helps somehow or not :)

Thanks for the idea. Unfortunately, it didn't help. :(

Blocks definitely do begin hitting the disk much sooner after I begin the
transfer, but the overall time is basically unchanged: 7:08. vmstat still shows
the widely oscillating bo value.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.079 / U:0.392 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site